God and advanced technology can coexist in our understanding of reality. As an adult, I have always identified as an agnostic—it is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power. Just as I suspend judgment about religious matters, I do the same regarding the Simulation Hypothesis. I do not have the capacity to fully know or understand the truth about such matters. However, I have felt the power of God in my life, and I have also considered the possibility of my reality being part of a simulation.
Introduction
The Simulation Hypothesis proposes that what we perceive as reality might actually be a highly sophisticated computer simulation. This idea has gained traction not only in scientific and philosophical circles but also in pop culture, with films like The Matrix and books by authors such as Philip K. Dick exploring similar concepts. At its core, the hypothesis challenges the very nature of existence, asking whether we can trust our senses and what it truly means to be “real.”
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." — PKD
Origins of the Simulation Hypothesis
The concept of questioning reality isn't new. In ancient philosophy, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave described prisoners who only saw shadows on a wall, mistaking them for reality. Similarly, René Descartes pondered whether an evil demon could be deceiving him about the existence of the world.
"Cogito, ergo sum" — René Descartes
In modern times, philosopher Nick Bostrom formalized the Simulation Hypothesis in a 2003 paper, "Are we living in a computer simulation?" Bostrom argued that at least one of the following must be true:
Advanced civilizations never reach the capability to run simulations of reality.
Advanced civilizations choose not to run such simulations.
We are almost certainly living in a simulation.
This trilemma opened a new way of thinking about our place in the universe.
Core Premises of the Hypothesis
The Simulation Hypothesis relies on some key ideas.
Exponential Technological Growth: Human advancements in computing power, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality suggest that simulating complex environments might one day be possible.
Indistinguishability of Simulated and Base Realities: If a simulation is detailed enough, the beings within it might never realize they are not in base reality.
The Infinite Regression Problem: If we are in a simulation, the creators of our simulation might also be simulated, leading to a potentially infinite chain of simulations.
Scientific and Philosophical Arguments
Proponents of the Simulation Hypothesis often cite probabilities. If countless simulations could exist, the likelihood of our reality being the original seems low. Philosophers like David Chalmers argue that even if we are in a simulation, the simulated reality has its own rules and significance.
However, skeptics like Neil deGrasse Tyson suggest the hypothesis is untestable, and thus not scientifically useful. Others argue that the energy required to simulate an entire universe may exceed any civilization’s capabilities.
Technological Feasibility
The rapid evolution of technology gives weight to the hypothesis. Virtual reality headsets create immersive environments, while AI can simulate human behavior. Quantum computing could one day simulate entire universes by processing massive amounts of data.
However, there are challenges. Current simulations lack the depth and complexity of real life, and it is unclear how long it would take to develop technology capable of simulating human consciousness.
Religious and Ethical Implications
The Simulation Hypothesis, while rooted in modern technology and philosophy, can coexist with religious beliefs. For many, it does not negate the existence of God but rather offers a new framework for understanding divine creation. Instead of viewing God as a supernatural being creating the world through mysterious means, one could see God as a master architect or programmer who designed reality with intention and purpose. The Simulation Hypothesis parallels many creation stories.
Belief in God and the Simulation Hypothesis
The idea that our universe might be a simulation does not inherently contradict the belief in a higher power. In fact, several parallels can be drawn between traditional religious teachings and the simulation concept.
Creation Narrative — Most major religions describe a creation story in which a higher power brings the universe into existence. In Christianity, God speaks the world into being. This aligns with the idea of a programmer writing code to manifest a virtual world. The process of creating a universe, whether through divine speech or advanced technology, suggests intentional design.
The Concept of an Omniscient Creator — In the Simulation Hypothesis, the creators of the simulation would be all-knowing within that system. They would have control over the parameters of the universe, much like the God described in the Bible. Psalm 147:5 says, “Great is our Lord and mighty in power; His understanding has no limit.” This verse can be interpreted to describe a creator who understands every detail of the created world—a programmer with full knowledge of the system they designed.
Moral and Ethical Guidelines — Religions provide moral codes for their followers. If we live in a simulation, it is possible that the creators have embedded moral guidelines into the system to ensure ethical behavior among its inhabitants. From this perspective, religious teachings might serve as the “programming” that guides human behavior, much like code dictates the behavior of a simulated environment.
Life as a Test — Many religions view life as a test of faith and character, with consequences in the afterlife based on one's actions. If our reality is a simulation, life could be seen as a controlled environment where the creators observe how we respond to various challenges. This aligns with the Christian belief in free will and personal accountability.
The Role of Faith in a Simulated World
For those with religious beliefs, the Simulation Hypothesis does not necessarily diminish the role of faith. Instead, it can enhance it.
Faith in God's Purpose: Just as believers have faith in God, they could also trust that God has a purpose for everything, including the design of our reality—whether it's understood as part of the natural world or a grand, divinely orchestrated simulation.
Mystery of Existence: Religions often emphasize the mystery of God’s ways. Similarly, the Simulation Hypothesis presents a mystery. The full motives or methods of God are beyond our understanding. This holds true even if our world is part of a simulation, a greater design.
Does the Hypothesis Challenge Free Will?
A common concern is that if we are in a simulation, we may not have free will. However, this is not necessarily true. Just as a programmer can create a virtual world with autonomous characters who make their own choices within the parameters of the program, God created a world where humans have genuine free will.
In Christianity, the idea of free will is central to the relationship between God and humanity. People are free to choose their actions, and these choices determine their spiritual outcomes. This belief can be reconciled with the idea of living in a simulation where we have the freedom to make decisions, despite existing within a structured system. Whether living in a simulation or not, the idea of free will does not change.
Biblical Parallels to a Simulated World
The Bible contains several passages that resonate with the idea that the world might not be what it seems. Consider the following verses:
1 Corinthians 13:12 — “For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face.” This verse suggests that our current understanding of reality is limited, much like characters in a simulation would have a limited understanding of the larger system they are part of.
Proverbs 3:5 — "Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding" If we are living in a simulation, this verse reminds us that we cannot rely solely on human reasoning to grasp the nature of reality; instead, we must trust in God’s greater design, even if it remains beyond our understanding.
Jeremiah 3:15 — "Then I will give you shepherds after my own heart, who will lead you with knowledge and understanding." God provides guidance through those who share divine wisdom, which can help us navigate questions of existence, whether we perceive reality as physical, spiritual, or simulated.
Luke 17:20-21 — “The kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the kingdom of God is in your midst.” This passage hints at a deeper reality that exists beyond what we can perceive with our senses, much like a simulation’s underlying code.
1 John 2:15 — “Do not love the world or anything in the world. If anyone loves the world, love for the Father is not in them.” If we are in a simulation, this verse could take on new meaning. It could be seen as a reminder not to become overly attached to material things in a world that might be temporary or illusory.
Isaiah 55:8-9 — "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways," declares the Lord. "As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts." This verse reflects the idea that God's ways transcend human understanding, paralleling the mystery behind the Simulation Hypothesis and the limitations of our perception of reality.
What Would Be the Purpose of the Simulation?
From a religious perspective, the Simulation Hypothesis could be viewed as God’s way of creating a controlled environment for spiritual growth and testing. The simulation could serve several purposes:
Moral Development — In Christianity, life is seen as an opportunity for moral and spiritual growth. A simulated world could be designed to present challenges that help individuals grow in compassion, patience, and faith.
Observation of Free Will — If God is the ultimate programmer, the simulation allows God to observe how individuals exercise free will. This aligns with the Christian belief that humans are judged based on their choices and actions.
Preparation for a Higher Reality — Some religious teachings suggest that life on Earth is a preparation for a higher, eternal reality. In this context, the simulation could be a training ground for the soul, preparing it for the afterlife.
How Different Religions Might View the Hypothesis
Different religions could interpret the Simulation Hypothesis in unique ways.
Christianity: God is the creator of the simulation, and Jesus’s teachings provide the guidelines for living within it. The afterlife would be the transition from the simulated world to the “real” world.
Hinduism: The concept of Maya (illusion) in Hinduism aligns closely with the Simulation Hypothesis. Hindu teachings suggest that the physical world is an illusion, and true reality lies beyond it.
Buddhism: Buddhism teaches that reality is shaped by perceptions and that enlightenment involves seeing beyond illusions. The Simulation Hypothesis could fit well within this framework.
Reconciling Faith and Technology
Believing in the Simulation Hypothesis does not mean abandoning faith. Instead, it offers a new lens through which to view spiritual teachings. The advancements in technology that allow us to consider such ideas may themselves be seen as part of God’s plan, revealing more about the nature of existence as we evolve.
God as the Ultimate Creator — Just like people create virtual worlds or video games, God could have created an advanced civilization capable of building simulations. These beings, in turn, created our reality as a simulated environment. This keeps God as the original Creator of everything, including those advanced beings.
A Layered Creation — Think of it like a hierarchy. God is at the top, creating everything, including the advanced beings. They become like God’s tools to bring about the simulated world we experience. This concept is not too different from how Christians believe God uses people to fulfill His plans.
Free Will Still Applies — Even in a simulation, free will can exist. The advanced beings would have created a world where humans can make choices, and God’s divine plan could still unfold through those choices. It does not take away from God’s sovereignty; it just adds layers to how creation works.
Even if we are living in a simulation, it does not remove God from the equation. God created the advanced beings who made the simulation. So, the simulation itself is still a part of God's divine plan. The Simulation Hypothesis suggests that everything traces back to God, no matter how advanced or layered reality might be.
Evidence For and Against
Evidence For: The existence of patterns in nature that resemble computational processes, like the discrete nature of particles. Unexplained phenomena in physics, such as the fine-tuning of universal constants, could suggest intentional design.
Evidence Against: The lack of observable “glitches” or proof of external interference.
The hypothesis might rely too heavily on speculative technology.
What It Means for Us
If we are in a simulation, it could reshape how we view life, death, and purpose. Some might feel liberated, seeing existence as a temporary experience in a larger system. Others could struggle with existential dread, feeling life is less meaningful.
Still, many argue that whether or not life is simulated, the experiences and relationships we have are real to us and hold inherent value.
Conclusion
The Simulation Hypothesis challenges our understanding of reality, pushing the boundaries of science and philosophy. While we may never know for certain whether we live in a simulation, exploring these ideas encourages us to remain curious about the mysteries of existence. Perhaps the greatest takeaway is the reminder to approach life with an open mind, always questioning and seeking truth.
Whether we live in a created simulation or the real world, our understanding is limited. We should place our faith in God rather than fully relying on human logic to explain our reality. Even if someone created a simulation, it would not change the importance of trusting in God's ultimate wisdom and purpose.
If we are part of a simulation, it would not negate the presence of spiritual guidance. God promises to provide shepherds—teachers, leaders, or even advanced creators—who can impart wisdom. No matter how reality is structured, God's plan includes people who will lead us toward greater knowledge and understanding, whether they are within or outside the simulation.
I would be interested to read your thoughts on the Simulation Hypothesis. Feel free to share any insights or perspectives in the comments below or on the Get in Touch page!
Isaiah 40:28
"Do you not know? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and His understanding no one can fathom."
Comments