The Dawn Dimmed By Mist

I recently encountered a song that resonated deeply with its powerful message of reclaiming identity, breaking free from the past, and standing boldly in one’s truth. The lyrics spoke of integrity, authenticity, and light. However, my experience engaging with the creator of this song left me questioning whether their actions reflected the values they so eloquently expressed. The act left me confused and, honestly, a bit disappointed.

Here are key points from the song and how their unkindness stood in stark opposition:

• “I summon my spirit; my power returns. No force may tether, no shadow may hold.” These words speak of freedom and truth, yet when I respectfully reached out to suggest writing a post about their song—or offered them the chance to share their voice—they silenced me by deleting my comment. Their act felt like the very tethering and shadow they claimed to rise above.

  
  

• “I unchain my heart, I rewrite the song.” They sang of unchaining and rewriting, yet their action denied collaboration and shut down a potential connection. How does one embrace openness while rejecting a simple gesture of admiration?

  
  

• “I stand in protection, a fortress of light.” A fortress of light suggests kindness, protection, and inclusivity. But deleting a comment from someone who only wanted to celebrate their work feels more like a closed gate than a beacon of welcome.

  
  

• “In silence, I find the voice I ignored.” This line emphasizes the importance of listening, yet their dismissal of my comment showed no effort to hear or engage. Actions like these undermine the very value of finding one’s voice.

  
  

• “I shine in my presence, unwavering, free.” To shine in presence means to embody grace and authenticity. Dismissing a kind offer does not align with freedom or unwavering strength; it reflects fear or disregard.

  
  

• “Each word that I speak, each step that I take, ripples with purpose, with worlds that I make.” Their words indeed ripple, but so do their actions. By rejecting a small act of goodwill, they created ripples of disconnection and discouragement—hardly the world-building their lyrics suggest.

  
  

Their song paints a picture of transformation and empowerment, and perhaps it does reflect their truth. But in that moment, their behavior contradicted the meaning so beautifully woven into their lyrics. Kindness and acknowledgment cost nothing, yet they have immeasurable impact. It is a reminder that words are only as meaningful as the actions that follow them—actions speak louder than words. Why silence someone who wanted to amplify and appreciate the very spirit of the song?

I am sharing this song because its message transcends the actions of its creator. The words speak of reclaiming identity, breaking free from darkness, and standing in the light of truth. These ideals are too powerful and meaningful to be overshadowed by unkindness. While their decision to delete my comment was disheartening, I believe the song itself carries a lesson that should be shared: that we can rise above negativity, honor what inspires us, and let the message of hope and resilience shine even when circumstances challenge our faith in others.

2 Corinthians 4:8-9

"We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed."